Scroll below the image on loc.gov to the section labelled "Cite this item". Copy any one of the citation styles into the copyright/attribution notice section.
The car's design may be patented, but there are no patent design details present here.
The car's brand dressing may be trademarked, but there are no trademarks or brand identities present here.
The author of the photos, videos, and resultant rotoscoping (Vircon32) is the owner of the copyright of these assets. Just as the photographer who takes a picture of the Empire State Building is the copyright owner of the photo, not the architecht who patented the building's design.
Although "distinctiveness" is often diminished at this resolution, I believe this spritesheet is still distinct from the inspiration source. There is no indications of copyright- nor trademark- violations.
I remember that show. Thank you for sharing @luckygreentiger, and thank you @RadThadd for being on the lookout.
Yes. They are each very different. Well, CC-By and GPL are very different, but there is also a reason for version 2 and version 3 to be listed on this asset.
GPL makes it easy to use this audio in your project if your project already uses GPL content.
CC-BY makes it easy for you to use it in your project if your project uses anything other than GPL content.
As another practical example, GabrielTurner uses AI to comment on AI discussions :P
Thanks.
...Wait, did I actually use the exact image in my example?
Scroll below the image on loc.gov to the section labelled "Cite this item". Copy any one of the citation styles into the copyright/attribution notice section.
It is. Please credit the photo as is required by submission guidelinesEDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
Where is that texture from?
This is my understanding:
Are you "fmoriera"?
Although "distinctiveness" is often diminished at this resolution, I believe this spritesheet is still distinct from the inspiration source. There is no indications of copyright- nor trademark- violations.
I remember that show. Thank you for sharing @luckygreentiger, and thank you @RadThadd for being on the lookout.
Yes. They are each very different. Well, CC-By and GPL are very different, but there is also a reason for version 2 and version 3 to be listed on this asset.
GPL makes it easy to use this audio in your project if your project already uses GPL content.
CC-BY makes it easy for you to use it in your project if your project uses anything other than GPL content.
See FAQ "What do the licenses mean" and "Some artists have multiple licenses listed..."
Please start attributing your textures in accordance with site submission guidelines.
Pages