I'm guessing you used a CC0 licensed image as a base for creating this, like you did with some of the statues? Your "use at your own risk" comes from the concern that the original may have been mislicensed?
BTW, I'm adding this to my statues collection. :)
Edit: If you did use a base image, would you mind linking to it?
If it were to be on a sub-site, I suppose it could access the main OGA database so that users can search through the "non-lewd" art as well without changing sites. Ya?
I agree with Sharm. I think it would completely change the nature of OGA.
And if the site did cater to this, it should have the option to filter out explicit material. That is probably a given.
I honestly don't want anything explicit on the site. I definitely wouldn't be showing the site to my young neices & nephews for the risk of running across something. No filtering system is perfect. We would be dependent on submitters marking explicit submissions as such. Else we would have to start screening submissions. And I think OGA already might have more workload than it has resources. Allowing such material will put a larger burden on the administrators.
According to my understanding of how the licensing on OGA works, you can choose which license you want to use it under. So it is not required to abide by ShareAlike licensing if you wish.
openclipart.org is a pretty safe site to use for CC0 material. Thanks mold! :)
I am amazed by your pixel art style. If I had the money, I would probably offer to hire you. ^^
Edit: I'm ready to hit the "favorite" button on your next submission. :p
Lol!
I'm guessing you used a CC0 licensed image as a base for creating this, like you did with some of the statues? Your "use at your own risk" comes from the concern that the original may have been mislicensed?
BTW, I'm adding this to my statues collection. :)
Edit: If you did use a base image, would you mind linking to it?
If it were to be on a sub-site, I suppose it could access the main OGA database so that users can search through the "non-lewd" art as well without changing sites. Ya?
Created some handymen sprites for Stendhal based on your work. Thank you very much.
I agree with Sharm. I think it would completely change the nature of OGA.
And if the site did cater to this, it should have the option to filter out explicit material. That is probably a given.
I honestly don't want anything explicit on the site. I definitely wouldn't be showing the site to my young neices & nephews for the risk of running across something. No filtering system is perfect. We would be dependent on submitters marking explicit submissions as such. Else we would have to start screening submissions. And I think OGA already might have more workload than it has resources. Allowing such material will put a larger burden on the administrators.
Good for a Game Over scenario.
It's beautiful. I wish I could favorite it twice!
This is bringing me back to the underwater levels in Donkey Kong Country. :)
According to my understanding of how the licensing on OGA works, you can choose which license you want to use it under. So it is not required to abide by ShareAlike licensing if you wish.
Does someone wish to clarify or correct me?
@Sypher Zent: You can use it under either.
Pages